NATO etiketine sahip kayıtlar gösteriliyor. Tüm kayıtları göster
NATO etiketine sahip kayıtlar gösteriliyor. Tüm kayıtları göster

9.5.11

Nato units left 61 African migrants to die of hunger and thirst

Dozens of African migrants were left to die in the Mediterranean after a number of European and Nato military units apparently ignored their cries for help, the Guardian has learned.

A boat carrying 72 passengers, including several women, young children and political refugees, ran into trouble in late March after leaving Tripoli for the Italian island of Lampedusa. Despite alarms being raised with the Italian coastguard and the boat making contact with a military helicopter and a Nato warship, no rescue effort was attempted.

All but 11 of those on board died from thirst and hunger after their vessel was left to drift in open waters for 16 days. "Every morning we would wake up and find more bodies, which we would leave for 24 hours and then throw overboard," said Abu Kurke, one of only nine survivors. "By the final days, we didn't know ourselves … everyone was either praying, or dying."

International maritime law compels all vessels, including military units, to answer distress calls from nearby boats and to offer help where possible. Refugee rights campaigners have demanded an investigation into the deaths, while the UNHCR, the UN's refugee agency, has called for stricter co-operation among commercial and military vessels in the Mediterranean in an effort to save human lives.

"The Mediterranean cannot become the wild west," said spokeswoman Laura Boldrini. "Those who do not rescue people at sea cannot remain unpunished."

Her words were echoed by Father Moses Zerai, an Eritrean priest in Rome who runs the refugee rights organisation Habeshia, and who was one of the last people to be in communication with the migrant boat before the battery in its satellite phone ran out.

"There was an abdication of responsibility which led to the deaths of over 60 people, including children," he claimed. "That constitutes a crime, and that crime cannot go unpunished just because the victims were African migrants and not tourists on a cruise liner."

This year's political turmoil and military conflict in north Africa have fuelled a sharp rise in the number of people attempting to reach Europe by sea, with up to 30,000 migrants believed to have made the journey across the Mediterranean over the past four months. Large numbers have died en route; last month more than 800 migrants of different nationalities who left on boats from Libya never made it to European shores and are presumed dead.

Underlining the dangers, on Sunday more than 400 migrants were involved in a dramatic rescue when their boat hit rocks on Lampedusa.

The pope, meanwhile, in an address to more than 300,000 worshippers, called on Italians to welcome immigrants fleeing to their shores.

The Guardian's investigation into the case of the boat of 72 migrants which set sail from Tripoli on 25 March established that it carried 47 Ethiopians, seven Nigerians, seven Eritreans, six Ghanaians and five Sudanese migrants. Twenty were women and two were small children, one of whom was just one year old. The boat's Ghanaian captain was aiming for the Italian island of Lampedusa, 180 miles north-west of the Libyan capital, but after 18 hours at sea the small vessel began running into trouble and losing fuel.

Using witness testimony from survivors and other individuals who were in contact with the passengers during its doomed voyage, the Guardian has pieced together what happened next. The account paints a harrowing picture of a group of desperate migrants condemned to death by a combination of bad luck, bureaucracy and the apparent indifference of European military forces who had the opportunity to attempt a rescue.

The migrants used the boat's satellite phone to call Zerai in Rome, who in turn contacted the Italian coastguard. The boat's location was narrowed down to about 60 miles off Tripoli, and coastguard officials assured Zerai that the alarm had been raised and all relevant authorities had been alerted to the situation.

Soon a military helicopter marked with the word "army" appeared above the boat. The pilots, who were wearing military uniforms, lowered bottles of water and packets of biscuits and gestured to passengers that they should hold their position until a rescue boat came to help. The helicopter flew off, but no rescue boat arrived.

No country has yet admitted sending the helicopter that made contact with the migrants. A spokesman for the Italian coastguard said: "We advised Malta that the vessel was heading towards their search and rescue zone, and we issued an alert telling vessels to look out for the boat, obliging them to attempt a rescue." The Maltese authorities denied they had had any involvement with the boat.

After several hours of waiting, it became apparent to those on board that help was not on the way. The vessel had only 20 litres of fuel left, but the captain told passengers that Lampedusa was close enough for him to make it there unaided. It was a fatal mistake. By 27 March, the boat had lost its way, run out of fuel and was drifting with the currents.

"We'd finished the oil, we'd finished the food and water, we'd finished everything," said Kurke, a 24-year-old migrant who was fleeing ethnic conflict in his homeland, the Oromia region of Ethiopia. "We were drifting in the sea, and the weather was very dangerous." At some point on 29 or 30 March the boat was carried near to a Nato aircraft carrier – so close that it would have been impossible to be missed. According to survivors, two jets took off from the ship and flew low over the boat while the migrants stood on deck holding the two starving babies aloft. But from that point on, no help was forthcoming. Unable to manoeuvre any closer to the aircraft carrier, the migrants' boat drifted away. Shorn of supplies, fuel or means of contacting the outside world, they began succumbing one by one to thirst and starvation.

The Guardian has made extensive inquiries to ascertain the identity of the Nato aircraft carrier, and has concluded that it is likely to have been the French ship Charles de Gaulle, which was operating in the Mediterranean on those dates.

French naval authorities initially denied the carrier was in the region at that time. After being shown news reports which indicated this was untrue, a spokesperson declined to comment.

A spokesman for Nato, which is co-ordinating military action in Libya, said it had not logged any distress signals from the boat and had no records of the incident. "Nato units are fully aware of their responsibilities with regard to the international maritime law regarding safety of life at sea," said an official. "Nato ships will answer all distress calls at sea and always provide help when necessary. Saving lives is a priority for any Nato ships."

For most of the migrants, the failure of the Nato ship to mount any rescue attempt proved fatal. Over the next 10 days, almost everyone on board died. "We saved one bottle of water from the helicopter for the two babies, and kept feeding them even after their parents had passed," said Kurke, who survived by drinking his own urine and eating two tubes of toothpaste. "But after two days, the babies passed too, because they were so small."

On 10 April, the boat washed up on a beach near the Libyan town of Zlitan near Misrata. Of the 72 migrants who had embarked at Tripoli, only 11 were still alive, and one of those died almost immediately on reaching land. Another survivor died shortly afterwards in prison, after Gaddafi's forces arrested the migrants and detained them for four days.

Jack Shenker in Lampedusa
guardian.co.uk, Sunday 8 May 2011

15.1.09

NATO’nun dönüşü…

Tuncay Güney’in 2001 yılında polise verdiği ifadenin sesli ve görüntülü yayınının yarattığı deprem…
Ya da…
Ankara Demetevler’de bir parkta poşet içinde iki el bombası bulunması…
Çankaya’da dün gece bulunan bir poşetten ise 200 adet G-3 mermisi çıkması gibi olaylar…
İtalya ya da diğer Akdeniz ülkelerinde olduğu gibi, 1952’de NATO’nun “Sovyet İşgaline” karşı örgütlediği Ergenekon yapısı tamamen çözülünceye kadar, galiba bundan böyle umuru adiye’den olaylar olacak…
Orada bu “paralel orduları”, Sovyet’lerin çöküşünün hemen ertesinde demokratik ülkelerin kendi iradeleri çözmüştü…
Biz de ise ülkenin bağrına saplanmış bu ölüm makinesi sökülmediği gibi hedef de şaşırdı…
Demokrasiyi, halk iradesini, batı ittifakını ve hatta NATO’yu hedef alan hale geldi…
Üstelik…
NATO o günden bugüne değişmiş olmasına rağmen…

* * *

NATO kurulduğunda Sovyet’lere karşı en vurucu ölüm makinesi, Soğuk Savaş’ın en keskin kılıcıydı…
Sovyet’lerin çökmesi ardından nitelik değiştirdi…
NATO 1949 yılında kurulmuştu… Soğuk Savaş’ın “İleri Karakolu” konumundaki Türkiye ise 1952 yılında, Yunanistan, İspanya ve Batı Almanya’dan çok önce üye oldu…
Nitelik değişimin en şaşırtıcı virajı ise 1998 yılında, NATO ellinci kuruluş yılını kutlarken yaşandı… Örgüt, “demokrasiyi korumayı” da temel hedefi haline getirdi… Kendi halkına eziyet eden Miloseviç’in ülkenin “hükümdarlık” hakkına pabuç bırakılmadan NATO tarafından devrilmesi bu açıdan bir milattır…

* * *

Ankara’daki “askeri cumhuriyet” ise demokrasiden, demokratikleşmeden haz etmiyordu…
Soğuk Savaş tamtamları ve anti-komünizm şartlanması, bir de tek parti zihniyetiyle sarmalanınca yeniliğe, dönüşüme, değişime karşı delinmesi zor bir zırh oluşturmuştu…
AB süreci bunu iyice zorlamaya başlayınca, demokrasi korkusu batı karşıtı yeni ittifaklar aramayı bile gündeme getirdi…
Batı’yı boşlayarak NATO’dan ayrılmak, bölgedeki diktatörlüklerle, hatta din devletleriyle yeni ittifaklara gitmek üst düzey askerler tarafından dillendirilir oldu…
“Batılı modernleşme” ile övünen askerlerin kimileri, demokrasi korkusuyla tam zıt bir yöne hamle etmeye hazırdı…

* * *

“Kemalizm’den Humeyni’ye” savrulmanın en şaşırtıcı örneği hiç tartışmasız Milli Güvenlik Kurulu eski Genel Sekreteri ve son Ergenekon şüphelisi Tuncer Kılınç’dı…
Çünkü…
Tuncer Kılınç, “NATO’da en uzun görev yapan Türk Paşası”…
Ama MGK Genel Sekreterliği görevinin hemen başlarında, “Çin, Rusya, İran ve Suriye ile ittifak kuralım” diyen de o oldu…
Orada da kalmadı…
Atatürkçü Düşünce Derneği Genel Başkanı Jandarma eski Genel Komutanı emekli Orgeneral Şener Eruygur ile İngiltere Atatürkçü Düşünce Derneği’nin konuğu olarak 29 Mayıs 2007 tarihinde katıldıkları “Cumhuriyetimize Sahip Çıkmak” konulu konferansta, NATO’nun işlevinin sorgulanmaya başlandığını belirten Kılınç:
Günümüzde NATO belirsizlikler içinde Batıya yönelecek tehdide karşı kullanılacak bir güç olarak görülse de özellikle asimetrik savaş kavramı içinde etkinlikle kullanılabilecek bir yapıda olmadığı açıktır.
Türkiye’nin Batı hegemonyasından ve sömürgesinden kurtulmasının bir şekilde NATO’dan ayrılmasıyla sağlanacağı değerlendirilmektedir.
Bu şekilde güçlü bir silahlı kuvvete sahip Türkiye, her iki taraf içinde aranılan bir güç olacağı gibi, diğer güç odaklarıyla da daha yakın işbirlikleri kurabilme esnekliğine kavuşacaktır” diyor…
Ve ekliyordu:
Bu durumda Türkiye başta Rusya olmak üzere diğer güç merkezleri için de cazibe oluştur”…

* * *

Ergenekon Terör Örgütü sadece içeride bir darbe girişimi değil…
Türkiye’yi “Batı’daki demokrasi ittifakından” koparma girişimi…
AB’den tutun da, kimlik değiştiren NATO’ya karşı beliren ani alerji bundan…
Şimdi, anlaşılan, içerde ve dışarıda, hedef alınan irade harekete geçti…
Halk iradesi, demokrasi ve batı medeniyeti koalisyonu Ergenekon’u ortaklaşa teşrih masasına yatırmak istiyor…
Özetle NATO askeriye üzerinden tekrar geri dönüyor denilebilir…

* * *

Hükümet eğer bu hayırlı süreci kazasız belasız yürütüp köklü bir değişime taşımak istiyor ise, an sektirmeden var gücüyle AB sürecine bastırmalı…
Çünkü “dünyalaşma” sürecini aksatmak demek, Ergenekon’a yeniden can verme anlamına gelmekte…
Mehmet Altan, Star, 15 Ocak 2009